Printable Version
Tell a friend
Vitter Stays Mum on Rape Vote
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Three weeks after David Vitter's controversial
vote against a bipartisan anti-rape provision,
Louisiana’s junior Senator has yet to offer any
explanation for his vote.
On October 6,
the U.S. Senate overwhelmingly passed a
bipartisan amendment to the Defense Department
Appropriation bill to prevent taxpayer money
from going to companies who sweep rape
allegations under the rug. The so-called
Franken amendment was inspired by Jamie Leigh
Jones, who was drugged and gang-raped by
co-workers while working in Iraq.
Vitter
was one of only 30 Republicans – all men – who
voted against the Franken Amendment. He has not
explained his vote.
"Since David Vitter
has refused to explain himself to the women and
families of Louisiana, we can only guess what
was going on in his head when he voted to
protect taxpayer-funded companies who sweep
rape and sexual assault under the rug," said
Louisiana Democratic Party Communications
Director Natalie Naquin
Harvey.
Representative Charlie Melancon
(D-Napoleonville) supports the amendment and
has written a letter to colleagues insisting
that it remain in the final bill once a
conference committee reconciles the versions
passed by the Senate and U.S. House of
Representatives.
"We cannot undo the
tragic story of what happened to Jamie Leigh
Jones, but we can go a long way to making sure
it doesn't happen again. If a company wants to
receive taxpayer dollars, they should not be
able to force victims to give up their
constitutional rights as a condition of
employment," Melancon wrote in an email to
supporters yesterday.