State Transportation Funding Update
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Dear Friends,
Last year, I’M
for
Iowa
promoted the 2007 Iowa State University
Wildness Symposium, organized by Mary
Swander. The event
was a watershed
experience for me.
Lynn and I had supper
with Bill McKibben and then listened to him
talk about global warming.
His compelling arguments for immediate
action
spurred us to get involved with the national
Step It Up coalition.
This year’s
event is February 17 – 19.
It looks like a great line-up of
speakers and
activities. For
detailed information,
visit http://engl.iastate.edu/4th-annual-symposium.
On the state
legislative front, I want to call your
attention
to one initiative in particular. HSB 628
is looking to pump $185 million per year into
expanding and maintaining the
state’s highways.
The legislation
should, at a minimum, make sure that
maintenance of existing roads is
prioritized over new construction.
And we need
provisions that guard against money being used
for roads that subsidize poor land-use
decisions. Under
current practice, this happens
extensively. The
millions of dollars
that paid for highway access to Jordan Creek
Mall is a case in point, as is the
proposed north-east
Polk
County
beltway. It’s high
time the Legislature
gave the DOT a clear directive that
transportation dollars should not enable
urban sprawl.
It’s also
critical that this bill place a high priority
on bus,
passenger rail, and bike and pedestrian
access.
The bus has always been DOT’s ugly step
child. Yet as
concern about farmland loss, air
quality, and global warming grow, it’s
important that
Iowa’s
35 bus systems (both rural and urban) are given
fair and equal treatment in the
budgeting process.
With regards to
pedestrian and bicycle access, the
discussion needs to move beyond recreational
trails to bikes and legs as
legitimate forms of transportation. Yes,
trails are wonderful.
Sometimes they can
even work into a commuting route. But
it’s just as important to invest in safe
sidewalks, bike lanes, and related
structural improvements.
If the bus is
the DOT’s ugly step child, passenger rail is
its orphan. There’s
no reason this
budget discussion shouldn’t include train
travel from the Quad Cities to
Council
Bluffs, from
Clinton
to Sioux
City, and points in
between.
Let’s make sure
this great opportunity isn’t frittered away
with the lion’s share of the new revenue going
to new highway construction.
Thanks for
reading,
Ed Fallon