Secure Our Voting System
Friday, January 25, 2008
Dear
Friends,
Armed with truth
and
darn good ideas, Iowans for Voting Integrity
are doing great work at the
Statehouse this year.
Their concerns
have found a receptive ear with the new
Secretary or State, Mike Mauro. The group strongly
supports Mauro’s proposal for
full funding of a statewide system of optically
scanned paper
ballots.
“Secretary
Mauro's
proposal is right on track. Voter-marked paper
ballots offer the most reliable
record of the voter's intent,” said Sean
Flaherty, co-chair of Iowans for
Voting Integrity. “The ballots are durable and
can be recounted easily by
hand.”
To comply with
Iowa's new law requiring a paper trail for
voting systems, counties that use
touch screen voting machines must install
printers or scrap the machines
altogether. In lieu
of the machines,
they can purchase a paper ballot system, in
which voters mark individual paper
ballots by hand or by using an assistive device
for voters with disabilities.
The paper ballots are then read by an optical
scanner and can be recounted by
hand.
The ATM-style
printers for the touch screens have come under
criticism from all sides in
recent years. They store votes on a continuous
roll, raising voter privacy
concerns. They are
prone to printer
jams, which can cause votes to be lost. And studies have shown
that the paper trail
printout is not checked by a significant number
of voters, and that the paper
roll is easily damaged either maliciously or by
accident.
Iowans for
Voting
Integrity also question the user-friendliness
of touch screens. Last year, the
group conducted a study of undervotes in
statewide races on the November 2006
ballot. (NOTE: “Undervote” refers to
the difference between
the number of valid ballots cast in the
election and the number of votes
tallied for a particular office.
Undervotes are considered by many voting
experts to be the single most
reliable measure of a voting system's
effectiveness and usability.) The study found that,
for all the contested
statewide races, counties that used only
voter-marked paper ballots with
optical scan had the lowest undervote. Counties
using a mix of paper ballots and touch screens
had the second-highest
undervote, and counties using only touch
screens at the polling place had the
highest
undervotes.
“When you see the
undervote
correlate with the equipment in all the
contested races, you have a good idea
what the best system is,” said Flaherty.
Mauro's push for
optical scan puts
Now
would be an excellent time to weigh in with
your state representative and
senator. Tell them
to support Secretary
of State Mauro’s initiative. The
security of our voting system depends on
it.
Thanks!
Ed
Fallon
