Printable Version
Tell a friend
A Look at Boswell's Campaign Contributions
Ed Fallon has always campaigned
for campaign finance reform. A key element has
always been his refusal to accept contributions
from political action committees (PACs) and
paid lobbyists. When Congressman Boswell was
interviewed on Iowa Press (02/29/08), he was asked
about being a “corporate Democrat.” He said
that he is not, adding, “. . . would you want
to deny nurses from contributing to their
associations so they could have a little bit of
a say? Would you want to deny teachers? Would
you want to deny farmers? Would
you want to deny anybody, labor workers, who
want to do something like that? And so
if it's legal and it gives them a chance to
have a voice by participating in a small amount
as an individual I think it’s all right. They
do it legally and that's the way I look at
it.” In an article published March 14,
2008 in The Knoxville Journal-Express,
Boswell campaign manager Scott Ourth claimed
not to know the percentage of Boswell’s funding
that comes from PACs. But he went on to make an
incredible claim: Ourth said
he does not know this percentage, but
most of Boswell’s funding comes from
small donations from everyday Iowans.
He added that if groups of teachers, nurses,
etc., want to pool their money to make
donations, it is their right.
First, it strains one’s credulity
to think that a campaign manager doesn’t know
the details of contributions to the campaign he
is managing, particularly since these details
must be reported to the Federal Election
Commission and are easily available to the
public via the FEC website. The fact that
roughly three-fourths of Congressman Boswell’s
campaign contributions come from PACs was the
subject of an article by Jane Norman in The Des
Moines Register on February 10, 2008.
According to the FEC website,
Congressman Boswell’s contributions for this
campaign through December 31, 2007 total
$722,327. Of that amount, $534,570 or 74% came
from 322 PAC contributions. Only 20 of the 322
PAC contributions come from Iowa. The other 302
(96%) are from outside of Iowa. Very little of
that money comes from “teachers and nurses.”
The Boswell campaign received
$184,899 from 164 individual contributors (just
under 26% of total contributions). Another
$459 came from the Democratic Congressional
Campaign Committee, in addition to its PAC
contributions. By way of contrast, Ed Fallon’s
campaign for Congress has, in the three months
it has been in operation, received about
$150,000 from approximately 1,700 donors.
The Boswell campaign has tried to
misdirect public attention from the source of
its financing. When Fallon received the
endorsement of Democracy for America (DFA), the
Boswell campaign falsely claimed that Ed was
taking money from DFA, which is a PAC. While
DFA normally gives contributions to candidates
it endorses, the DFA made it clear that no
money was given to the Fallon campaign because
they know Fallon doesn’t take money from PACs.
They did recommend to their members that they
make individual contributions through the
ActBlue website. After the false charges by the
Boswell campaign, DFA sent another fund-raising
email for Ed. Ed just received the endorsement
of the Stop the Arms Race Political Action
Committee (STARPAC), but again, they have not
offered a contribution to the campaign, as they
know Ed wouldn’t take it.
The
Sources of Boswell’s Campaign
Contributions
Back
to issues
SOURCES OF
BOSWELL’S CAMPAIGN
CONTRIBUTIONS
PACs VS.
INDIVIDUALS
PACs
Individuals
Total
2008
534,570 (74%)
184,898 (25.6%)
722,326
2006
1,278,314 (59.5%)
845,996 (39.4%)
2,147,051
2004
834,510 (53.6%)
689,972 (44.3%)
1,556,335
2002
818,736 (65%)
401,038 (31.8%)
1,260,270
2000
416,100 (54.9%)
307,062 (40.5%)
757,498
1998
1,085,664 (51.9%)
798,958 (38.2%)
2,091,286
1996
293,364 (46.6%)
262,696 (41.7%) 630,196
KINDS OF
PACs
Business
Labor
Ideological/Single
Issue
2008
49%
27.2%
23.8%
2006
38.5%
24.2%
37.2%
2004
38.6%
34.0%
27.4%
2002
30.6%
37.8%
31.7%
2000
55.1% 39.1%
5.8%
1998
35.9%
42.8%
21.3%
1996
49.5%
38.6% 12.0%
